Consolidating balance sheet foreign currency

The right way to prepare a consolidated statement of cash flows requires a bit of work. The subsidiary would remeasure assets and liabilities into U. Going forward, the subsidiary should measure monetary assets and liabilities at current (that is, balance sheet) exchange rates and recognize a gain or loss on that translation in net income.

The statement should be prepared using cash flow activity at the functional currency level that has been translated to the reporting currency using the average exchange rate in effect for the period. The statements prepared in euros and yen for each of the subsidiaries would be translated into U. dollars using the average exchange rate in effect, and all three would be combined, considering elimination entries, to create the consolidated statement of cash flows. This diverges significantly from the rules prior to the application of highly inflationary accounting where such gains and losses would be recognized only in OCI.

This gain or loss will not be eliminated in consolidation.

consolidating balance sheet foreign currency-75

Such a misclassification sounds benign, but it misstates net income and hides the gain or loss in an account that is normally presented as part of the statement of changes in equity.This mistake can arise when a company has an intercompany account (for example, a parent’s intercompany receivable from a subsidiary) recorded on the books of companies with different functional currencies. On that date, Parent Company A records a million receivable on its balance sheet, and the subsidiary records €6,961,000 on its balance sheet. Now assume that no other entries are recorded to this account, but that on March 31, 2011, Parent Company A must report its financial statements.The question is how the German subsidiary should record the offsetting debit to this transaction.The common mistake is to record the debit side of this transaction as part of the currency translation that is included in OCI.A key factor raising the stakes in foreign-currency reporting is the fact that U. companies are increasingly looking offshore for growth. And this volatility will likely continue, given recent headlines, such as the spike in the yen’s value following Japan’s devastating earthquake last March, the rise of China’s yuan to a new high versus the U. dollar last summer, and runaway inflation in developing countries such as Venezuela. This article examines three frequent mistakes that accountants make regarding the reporting of foreign currencies.

Avoiding these pitfalls can make a big difference to companies’ financial statements.The subsidiary recorded the amount on its books at the rate in effect at that time—

Avoiding these pitfalls can make a big difference to companies’ financial statements.The subsidiary recorded the amount on its books at the rate in effect at that time—$1 = €0.7000.At the next reporting period, the applicable exchange rate was $1 = €0.6000.The differences between those rates can be significant.Even if the difference between exchange rates is relatively small, the error is often obvious on the face of a company’s financial statements because either the statement of cash flows will omit the line item used to account for the effects of foreign currencies on cash flows or changes in cash flows will, on their face, correspond to changes in amounts reported on the consolidated balance sheets. company with a Venezuelan subsidiary would cease using bolivars as the functional currency of the Venezuelan subsidiary. 30, 2009, and those amounts would become the accounting basis of assets and liabilities for the Venezuelan subsidiary.The first common mistake is difficult to detect without knowing how the accounting system consolidates subsidiaries.

||

Avoiding these pitfalls can make a big difference to companies’ financial statements.

The subsidiary recorded the amount on its books at the rate in effect at that time—$1 = €0.7000.

At the next reporting period, the applicable exchange rate was $1 = €0.6000.

The differences between those rates can be significant.

Even if the difference between exchange rates is relatively small, the error is often obvious on the face of a company’s financial statements because either the statement of cash flows will omit the line item used to account for the effects of foreign currencies on cash flows or changes in cash flows will, on their face, correspond to changes in amounts reported on the consolidated balance sheets. company with a Venezuelan subsidiary would cease using bolivars as the functional currency of the Venezuelan subsidiary. 30, 2009, and those amounts would become the accounting basis of assets and liabilities for the Venezuelan subsidiary.

The first common mistake is difficult to detect without knowing how the accounting system consolidates subsidiaries.

= €0.7000.At the next reporting period, the applicable exchange rate was

Avoiding these pitfalls can make a big difference to companies’ financial statements.The subsidiary recorded the amount on its books at the rate in effect at that time—$1 = €0.7000.At the next reporting period, the applicable exchange rate was $1 = €0.6000.The differences between those rates can be significant.Even if the difference between exchange rates is relatively small, the error is often obvious on the face of a company’s financial statements because either the statement of cash flows will omit the line item used to account for the effects of foreign currencies on cash flows or changes in cash flows will, on their face, correspond to changes in amounts reported on the consolidated balance sheets. company with a Venezuelan subsidiary would cease using bolivars as the functional currency of the Venezuelan subsidiary. 30, 2009, and those amounts would become the accounting basis of assets and liabilities for the Venezuelan subsidiary.The first common mistake is difficult to detect without knowing how the accounting system consolidates subsidiaries.

||

Avoiding these pitfalls can make a big difference to companies’ financial statements.

The subsidiary recorded the amount on its books at the rate in effect at that time—$1 = €0.7000.

At the next reporting period, the applicable exchange rate was $1 = €0.6000.

The differences between those rates can be significant.

Even if the difference between exchange rates is relatively small, the error is often obvious on the face of a company’s financial statements because either the statement of cash flows will omit the line item used to account for the effects of foreign currencies on cash flows or changes in cash flows will, on their face, correspond to changes in amounts reported on the consolidated balance sheets. company with a Venezuelan subsidiary would cease using bolivars as the functional currency of the Venezuelan subsidiary. 30, 2009, and those amounts would become the accounting basis of assets and liabilities for the Venezuelan subsidiary.

The first common mistake is difficult to detect without knowing how the accounting system consolidates subsidiaries.

= €0.6000.The differences between those rates can be significant.Even if the difference between exchange rates is relatively small, the error is often obvious on the face of a company’s financial statements because either the statement of cash flows will omit the line item used to account for the effects of foreign currencies on cash flows or changes in cash flows will, on their face, correspond to changes in amounts reported on the consolidated balance sheets. company with a Venezuelan subsidiary would cease using bolivars as the functional currency of the Venezuelan subsidiary. 30, 2009, and those amounts would become the accounting basis of assets and liabilities for the Venezuelan subsidiary.The first common mistake is difficult to detect without knowing how the accounting system consolidates subsidiaries.